Recently SEOmoz posted about running a test that proved their thesis that nofollow PageRank sculpting still works (while actually only proving issues with sample size & methodology). But the issue of “proving” things with SEO publicly is typically a misguided one.
It is so hard to control variables in tests, and even if you could set up a control set many test types would be isolated to fictional words. But the issue with that is that the relevancy algorithms can change based on your location, the location where a particular keyword is commonly searched from, how many other competing results there are for that query (and what those other sites are changing while you test), and whatever algorithm shifts happen in Google while your test is going on (like promotion of certain vertical databases, baking in new pieces to the relevancy algorithms, improvements in related vocabularies, introduction of new penalties and filters), etc etc etc
But lets ignore all the above and pretend there is a way you can isolate variables or you notice something new and different and important. What happens when you mention it? Typically people tell you that you are full of crap, even when you are right.

Even if the test they did was legitimately scientifically valid they still likely would have got mocked for their efforts, just like I did in the above image (when I was right).
And the more data you share to “prove” your case all you are doing is lessening your competitive advantage over other market competitors. Lets say I wrote a blog post about “5 surprisingly strong links you can use to spam Google with great results” … well after I publish that the same day Google engineers will torch those link sources. The net effect of such efforts would be:
It is one of those rare lose/lose instance where literally nobody gains (unless it creates a self-serving controversy).
In what other “science” could reporting your results instantly alter/destroy them?
One conference I went to a while ago I only went for 1 day instead of 2. And then I saw on Twitter someone complained about me not showing up. Then I looked and saw that one of their sites competed with one of our sites. Was I really going to benefit by speaking on a panel where I give a direct competitor (with VC backing, decades of cumulative experience, more algorithmic leeway, etc.) any SEO tips? As an SEO that also does publishing you are only sacrificing your future revenues and your future net worth if/when you review competing sites and tell them how to compete better against you.
In the SEO industry it is hard to land 5 figure clients. But it is easy to build websites that make that recurring. You just have to put the time and effort in. But the only reason to share new and useful tips publicly is self-promotion. But even that is often a misguided effort because earning money servicing the SEO market is a bit like squeezing water out of a rock. People have free in their mindset and are irrationally stuck on free rather than the benefits of spending to save time and grow and earn more. Sorta self-defeating and certainly misguided if you take it too seriously, which is why I have been looking to build out other sites in other fields too.
I used to dislike misinformation in the SEO industry, but I have since come to realize that the more misinformed the public is the more opportunity there is for me. If it wasn’t abstract and full of misinformation then someone overseas would be doing it for $5 a day and I would lose most of my income. So I say lets see some more bogus scientific studies. Let there be published book authors telling you that the best backlinks to get are the ones which are shown in the Google link: search.
If the end value is $10’s of Billions but the market sets a price of free, then misinformation is a big piece of the price…that is basic economics.
The money doesn’t care how it got into your bank account (as long as it was legal). And you don’t have to spend a lot of time backsolving everyone else’s success … a lot of that time would be better spent building your own success. Truthfully most people who are successful can’t even tell you why they themselves are successful. Worse yet, the “scientific” case study earns nothing while the non-scientific site with tons of traffic (built through small incremental daily improvements by an amateur) can earn a lot of money.
Years ago I gave away so many valuable tips that simply just created competition for myself. (And eventually I woke up to that when some of the people who would contact me begging me for discount SEO services while claiming they were broke also sent buy requests into other sites I ran that they didn’t know I owned). There are lots of other issues like non-disclosure agreements that mean nothing when someone has access to your stats + owns competing sites, fake investors who try to scam you for your information, etc etc etc.
I still love this site as though it is a child…it was the first site that really helped build me into a position where I had more options and opportunity than time. And due to our current pricing point filtering out most of the SEO market the forums are still a great place for me to learn more :D
But, truth be told, in the SEO industry (as a service provider) almost everyone who comes to you likes to pretend that they are poor. They want to discount the price to nothing to help discount risk, but rarely (if ever) do they want to remove all risk and give you a piece of the upside for the millions of Dollars worth of extra profits you create for them.
But the cool thing with search is you can start off small and grow to compete. Sure it is always getting more competitive, but publishing tools are improving rapidly. If a person could read the archives of this blog for years and not be able to make money from search it simply means they lacked effort. Search offers so much opportunity that even without talent eventually anyone can stumble into something that works for them.
And that is the thing about SEO. Search offers so much opportunity that even without talent eventually anyone can stumble into something that works for them.
But they have to have the right mindset to succeed.
Dear sirs explain me all link buildings method are crucial to make me riches. Is very important Aaron Walls personally answers me this free and promptys … well that is not the right mindset, is it?
Investing time and money and effort and blood and tears…that is the right mindset. If you got nothing then you got nothing to lose. Give it your all.
Lots of the most interesting bits that you learn are from accidents that happen with experience. Accidentally blocking a part of your site in robots.txt, doing something weird with a redirect, having your host go down and getting your site crawled in a weird state, etc etc etc. Screwing up is where you learn a lot because that is where a lot of the surprises are. And it is far easier to learn when you are working on a number of sites at various stages of development…it gives you lenses through which to view search.
What works for one site might not work for the next. What works for one person might not work for the next. But there are many models that work and paths to success. Some people succeed because they are simply the best, or they love what they do, or they show up every day for years and years and years. Others succeed due to their irrational bias and ignorance. And some people were just early to the market and sorta fell into success.
One company spreads hyped up misinformation to an audience of ignorant drones who spread the misinformation, the next buys old domains that are heavily linked to and then pours garbage content into them using an assembly line sort of production model, the next has a person who does black public relations and tries to take down other industries (while learning their business models and working to clone them).
And yet other people are popular just because they are popular. Or because they were born rich and launched a sex tape on the web (complete with bogus fake legal stuff just to suck in more press coverage and “build the brand”).
Is SEO scientific? Yes, in the same way that sociology, psychology, and economics are scientific. But economics is referred to as the dismal science.
Anything that involves understanding human behavior and trying to influence it is not just science. It is also an art.
Here is to hoping you have a healthy, happy, profitable, and ARTISTIC 2010
How Do You Do Local SEO?
It’s quite clear that local SEO will be *one* of the places to be in 2010 and beyond. Need convincing?
Check out:

Speaking of the local 10 pack, it appears to have done part of its job for Google. Consider the following from TMPDM/ComScore

So Google’s maps increased sharply, likely due to the local 10 pack being shoved down people’s throats. I happen to like the 10 pack to some degree, more when I type in a town/city + service instead of my town + service because lots of times they pull from my IP which is a ways away from where I am now, which kind of renders the initial map findings a bit useless for me. I also like it much better when it takes up #4 in the rankings rather than having be at spot 1 or 2
One of the nice things about local SEO for me is that I don’t have to fuss around with a bazillion different keyword tools, cross reference data points, wonder which data sets are more accurate (and which ones are entirely useless), or spend time creating a site structure which ultimately has to be redesigned after finding some some of the keyword data was rubbish.
There are a few ways get a general idea of which keywords you should incorporate in your campaign. You can use tools like Google Trends, Google Insights, as well as PPC campaigns. You can also look at competing sites to see how they structure their page or site in order to target specific keywords.
So you just spoke at a local chamber of commerce meeting in your hometown of Atlanta and now you have the locals all fired up about search marketing. You end up landing a client named Mary Smith who owns Peachy Insurance Agency which has offices in Atlanta, Savannah, Macon, and Athens.
Mary has decided her agency is going to focus on vehicle insurance only. So she asks you to begin the process of figuring out which keywords best suit her goals. Will it be broader geo-local keywords (on the state level) or pursuing really local keywords (down to the town level) or both?
In this case, we have to figure out if car insurance or auto insurance is the more popular keyword in this specific area. I would start with the Adwords Keyword Tool to figure out if there is any big difference from a broad perspective

It appears that the modifier georgia and “auto” is a bit more popular (but it is pretty easy to work in other variations like the state abbreviation into your on-page copy)
Then I would head over to Google Insights for additional data points, one targeted to the state and one broader country wide search with local modifiers


Lastly, from a tool standpoint, I would give google trends a shot. They break out volume by town/city but I would still test that heavily in Adwords.

My next step would be to type in some keywords, since the difference is not huge and trying to target both might be a good move
Note the local box on the more niche, local search. Also, note how some sites target both car/auto. From a relevancy standpoint, Mary’s site should be able to do pretty well in these SERPS as a local resource guide, a local insurance agency, and a site which is not essentially a lead generation site. If Mary can create content which is valuable to the local community, earn local links, promote the site in local communities, etc.. she should do pretty well when compared to either thinner affiliate sites or one page off-shoots on a large lead generation domain.




The best way to figure out local keyword volume, or really any keyword’s volume in most cases, is to set up an adwords campaign. I like to set up 2 PPC campaigns:
So that second option will probably be fairly pricey but the long term payoffs of making sure you or your client are optimized for the correct keyword variations in your market are much bigger than any nominal PPC campaign costs.
So the volume might not be huge but keep in mind this is a local insurance agency. They may not be able to scale their operation with a huge firehose of traffic (say the 10’s of thousands places like Geico and Progressive receive per day), it is all relative.
You might proceed as follows:
Most of the time local SERPS are ripe if you can figure out which angle you want to pursue, be able to execute it, and have a client willing to spend some capital
Must have resources, for me, when launching an SEO campaign is to browse through the local search ranking factors and see how I can apply them to my client’s site. Also, I am a big fan of Andrew Shotland’s Local SEO Guide & understanding Google maps & local search.
Part 4 of Framing the Future: Data Privacy Demands more Diligence
As personalization becomes more the norm, a lot more focus is also going to be given to the trade-off between personalization and data privacy in the near future. As each step in bringing together the open standard web creates easier opportunities for organizations to link together (and perhaps abuse) personal information, there might be more incidents like the one that happened to Google Document users last March 7th. On that day Google inadvertently shared spreadsheet information with peoples´ contacts who were never granted permission to see them. Google admitted that “we’ve identified and fixed a bug which may have caused you to share some of your documents without your knowledge,” but these types of bugs could have serious repercussions for the people affected and for legal compliance rules.
In fact, the data privacy laws are also changing in response to the technology. In Germany, there has been a lot of discussion lately on whether or not using Google analytics is even legal since tracking and storing an IP address is considered holding onto personally identifiable information, which is not allowed by German law.
Google´s terms of service do state that “Google will not associate your IP address with any other data held by Google.” However, according to paragraph 15 “Modifications of the rules” “Google reserves the right to change the terms and conditions of this agreement at any time [...] [...] [...assuming that the changes taken into account [by Google] are reasonable for you.”
In sum, Google is sitting on a treasure trove of linked data that they could potentially use in the future in ways that might violate data privacy laws. A German lawyer has even said that it is possible that the “penalties could amount up to €50,000 (about $75,000) per website that uses Google Analytics to keep track of its visitors’ usage patterns.” So it will be quite interesting to see how this will play out in the next couple of years.
The expectation for Germany is that more conservative companies may start to require that their analytics providers have a TüV certificate, which is similar to a data privacy seal of approval. This will require that the company uses only anonymous IP addresses, that they are also offering an opt-out cookie capability, and that they only use servers that are based in Germany. At the minimum, more companies may also start to require that they are the rightful owners to their own analytics data, so that they are mitigating the risk involved with passing the data through a 3rd party tool and can at any point get all of their data returned upon request. Thus, any company should probably include in their analytics evaluation process both the question of who owns their data and how compliant their current tool is with the changing legal landscape.
This is Part 4: Data Privacy Demands more Diligence, of a Five Part Series; See also Part 1: Data Trumps Everything, Part 2: The Real Time Web Reality, Part 3: Data Filtering and Visualization Capabilities Matter, and tomorrow Part 5: Free Redefines the Market.
Cecily Robyn Lough has over 15 years experience in pulling actionable insights from online marketing data. She is currently Director of International Sales at Webtrekk GmbH in Berlin. Please contact her through LinkedIn or at cecilyspeaks@gmail.com.
The 2009 most searched lists just keep coming, this time from voice mobile search provider, Vlingo:
So where are the Michael Jackson searches? Vlingo president and CEO Dave Grannan explains:
Unlike traditional Web searches that focus on specific search terms such as ‘Michael Jackson’ or ‘Twilight,’ our data shows that on mobile phones, people tend to search for specific destinations sites and resources. Mobile Web search is very popular on Vlingo, accounting for over 20% of all usage. Based on our users’ top searches, we are seeing mobile extending far beyond SMS and voice communications to encompass multimedia and social networking.
StumbleUpon has had quite a year. They bought themselves back from eBay and launched a URL shortening service, among other things. Now, they’re revealing the most stumbled sites for their historic year that was 2009.
Here they are, broken down by category:
Arts
Jim Jarmusch Quote - 278K Stumbles
Aled Lewis Illustrations - 253K Stumbles
Pepsi Logo Response - 229K Stumbles
Bizarre/Oddities
99 Things You Should Have Seen On The Internet - 471K Stumbles
Scary Good Facepaint - 374K Stumbles
Slightly Warped Curiosities: Gibraltar Airport - 352K Stumbles
Food/Cooking
26 Cakes Perfect for Geeks - 290K Stumbles
Pasta Pie Recipe - 231K Stumbles
Hasselback Potatoes Recipe - 231K Stumbles
Environment
Air Traffic in 24 Hours - 130K Stumbles
Free Heat from Old Window and Soda Cans - 113K Stumbles
Think About Your Morning Latte - 112K Stumbles
Humor
Cheat Sheet for Travelling Back in Time - 472K Stumbles
Life Summarized in 4 Bottles - 439K Stumbles
As Luck Would Have It… - 369K Stumbles
Music
8 Tracks Mix: Songs that Make You Feel Better - 368K Stumbles
Gizmodo: Proof That Birds are Secret Composers - 313K Stumbles
Fun With Rap Music - 298K Stumbles
Photography
Peter Funch Street Photography - 410K Stumbles
Stunning Wildlife Camouflage - 356K Stumbles
14 Rare Color Photos From the FSA-OWI - 341K Stumbles
Science
Robot/People Art by Kacie Kinzer - 230K Stumbles
Photographs of and from the Hubble Space Telescope - 219K Stumbles
Default Password for Roadside Led Signs - 184K Stumbles
Travel
12 Most Amazing Pools in the World - 196K Stumbles
9 best Train Journeys in the World - 172K Stumbles
Anderson Cooper’s Blog: 28 things I wish I’d known before I started traveling - 165K Stumbles
Video Games
Ball Droppings - 292K Stumbles
Amazing Mario Level - 214K Stumbles
Canabalt - 192K Stumbles